"Anyone that is intelligent, as in knowing both sides of the argument, will agree with me. Anyone who is intentionally...

spectra-fidelis:

deconversionmovement:

spectra-fidelis:

deconversionmovement:

spectra-fidelis:

This is the definition of a bigot.

No.  That is the definition of objectivity.  Know both sides before you take one.  I have both sides.  You have one.  Anyone who knows both will side with me.  I will stand by that statement.  You are the religiously blind bigot who refuses to consider opposing evidence. 

And you just called people who look at both sides and don’t choose yours blind and foolish. Name-calling doesn’t justify you.

I concur with spectra.

Here is one of the faithful buddies I spoke about.  You will concur because you’re just as blind and religious as she is.  Spectra and the gang seriously need to stop trolling.  I don’t adhere to Christianity.  Accept it and walk away.  However, continue to impose your supposed truth and I will continue to publicize and humiliate any argument you think you have.  It is that simple. 

Humiliation must be felt by the person intended to be humiliated for such a word to be applied.

I never told you to be a Christian. You have told me I have no right to be, and that I have no right to beliefs, opinions, arguments, or to make any point from that basis.

Don’t attack my friends. It’s immature, and shows just how desperate you really are. I don’t reblog your followers unless they’re talking directly to me.

Frankly, Decon, I find myself disappointed.  All this time, you were focusing your hatred on one person as if he-or-she were the cause of all your suffering and opposition.  This strikes me as misguided, foolish and a tad pathological, but that is not the point.

You strike me as an intelligent man who likes to prove that intelligence by attempting to invalidate others, often through long, drawn-out, public arguments.  Albeit, Blackbird tends to do this once in a great while, but rarely is the opponent directly insulted…as you have just done to me, and I am now doing to you (this is something I must work on, but for the moment, I’m having too much fun; sorry).  I thought you had calmed down after the last time I had commented (rather rudely, I am afraid; again, sorry), but apparently I was wrong.  It is now clear your hostility is now directed not only at the person who has been arguing with you the most, but at anyone who shows the slightest disagreement with your fairly hateful and bigoted ideology.

Now then, in terms of illogical fallacies in this conversation alone, I have seen straw-manning, generalization (both hasty and sweeping in one go, good job), and false cause.  Keep going; a few more and I’ll be able to complete my bingo card and get that toaster oven I’ve had my eye on.

(via spectra-fidelis-deactivated2012)